Welcome to Discourses of War and Peace, a virtual conference in response to the ongoing war in Ukraine. Our first ad-hoc workshop will take place on 14 April 2022 on Zoom.
Two steps for joining this event:
Register by email.
- To receive the Zoom invitation link, please send an email to Jaspal Singh at: firstname.lastname@example.org, until 13 April 2022 midnight at the very latest.
Make a user profile and pay your annual DiscourseNet fees.
- To be eligible to participate at DiscourseNet events, you have to have (or create) a user profile on our website (see the tab on the top-right corner) and become a fee-paying member of DiscourseNet. The annual fee is €30. Instructions on how to pay your fees can be found here: https://discourseanalysis.net/DN - Please understand that we cannot send you a Zoom link (and let you into the meeting), if you are not a fee-paying member of DiscourseNet.
In the light of the ongoing campaign of the Russian government against the Ukrainian people, DiscourseNet, the international association of discourse researchers, expresses its deep solidarity with all the people who suffer (directly and indirectly) from the military conflict — especially our friends and colleagues from Ukraine directly affected by it. We are fully aware of the fact that the current situation will dramatically worsen the life and work conditions of our Russian colleagues, too.
Facilitating the academic exchange of different communities, beyond language boundaries, discriminatory categories and social hierarchies as well as using our research to foster democratic decision making, civic rights, various forms of informed activism, academic freedom, and peace are constituent parts of our network’s mission.
We observe the war in Ukraine with great concern. DiscourseNet encourages critical research to monitor the invasion and its effects on Ukraine, Russia and all the countries involved. In this mission, we expressly want to strengthen our relationship with Ukrainian as well as Russian scholars.
In the next few weeks, DiscourseNet will promote further discussions and host events about what discourse researchers can do in order to provide non-violent and democratic spaces for conflict prevention and resolution. We will discuss especially the power of words in armed conflicts as well as the power of discourses for peaceful dialogue.
The first ad-hoc workshop will take place as an online event on 14 April 2022, between 10.45am and 6.00pm EEST (Eastern European Summer Time).
All times are displayed in Eastern European Summer Time (EEST) (UTC+3).
The War Concept Patchwork: Conceptualization, Contradictions, Conflict, Communication
The ongoing war’s conceptualization, contradictions and conflict communication create an impression of a mixture of incompatible components reminding a patchwork, where every piece of fabric is unique by its form and colour. They are supposed to tell us the whole story in its logic order, but, basically, represent a mixture of discrete sheds.
The Russian World imaginary: transmitting supremacy through language and culture
I am going to address the “Russian world” imaginary and its role in the justification of the war in Ukraine. How does Russian state cultural policy contribute to the "Russian world" imaginary? What is the ‘mission of culture’ in constructing and maintaining the Russian world and its subjects?
Laughter through Tears: Role of Humor in Ukrainian Resistance Against Russian Aggression
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine that started on February 24 2022 leads not only to the shift of real and mental borders in Europe but also drives profound changes of not only geopolitical visions of the contemporary world but also of Ukrainian mentality and national identity. The paper seeks to define the role of humour in shaping the image of the enemy, Ukrainian army and Ukrainian nation. The data set is composed of more than 1000 caricatures and memes produced between February 24 and March 29.
The discursive political economy of the Russian rentier economy
The presentation analyses the discursive, economic and political elements of the Russian political economy that is – in contrast to almost all other rentier states – developing from a trade oriented economy to a rentier state. Through this “back-ward” orientation, specific expansionary dynamics emerge that Arrighi described as a switch from C-T-C´ to T-C-T’.
Statement from Ukraine
Galyna Zelenko (National Academy of Science of Ukraine), Mykola Trofimenko (Rector of Mariupol University)
War of Visuals, Emotions, and the Use of Cyber Tools
Sybille Reinke de Buitrago
The contribution will explore the nexus of visuals, emotions and new cyber tools in the Russian war against Ukraine.Visuals of conflict and suffering evoke emotions. The contribution considers how such visuals are used for mobilization, and how various people – from ordinary ones to hackers – have turned to various cyber tools to support either side in the war.
Collective paranoia in Russia
For centuries, Russian domestic policies have swung between “Western” and “Slavophile” phases. In my contribution, I propose to retrace some developments in Russian public discourse since perestroika, which has seen a progressive turn against the “West”. Starting from my discourse analysis of Putin in the early 2010s, I will discuss the discursive construction of collective paranoia in Russia (e.g. against the “NATO threat”) since the 2000s and some parallels with the recent rise of extreme right-wing discourses in liberal democracies.
Angermüller, J. (2012) ‘Fixing meaning. The many voices of the post-liberal hegemony in Russia’, Journal of Language and Politics, 11(2), pp. 115–134.
Political Languages of Current War
The aim of the research is to collect and compare how new challenges and differences of political language have reflected in national and global media. Research methods are discursive and narrative analysis of media mainstreams during the war between Ukraine and Russia in Slavic languages, English and French.
From “historical continuity” to “military operation”: Tracing Putin’s war plans in Kremlin’s ideology and propaganda
Ideological preparation for Russia’s overt invasion of Ukraine started much earlier than 2022. The first indicative shifts in the official discourse that can be retrospectively interpreted as such preparation can be traced at least back to the Russian constitutional referendum of 2020.
The discursive power of memes: Memetic discourse around the Ukrainian war
Liisi Laineste, Anastasiya Fiadotava, Guillem Castañar, Sergey Troitskiy
Memes offer responsive acute commentary on societal matters by using, reinforcing and recontextualising established stereotypes. They provide non-violent and democratic spaces of discussion for conflicts. Their inevitable discursive situatedness makes them an attractive tool for political online engagement, but at the same time, their ambiguity and commonplaceness undermines that function in many ways. The presentation focuses on memes on the Ukrainian war that spread in Eastern (Russia, Estonia, Belarus) and Western Europe (Spain). We analyse the discursive contexts of four small meme samples referring to the personalisation or “face” of the war: Putin, and the motives that relate to that: liar, enemy, coward etc. We pinpoint the use of local references to show the connections between the degree of a country’s engagement in the conflict and the content of memes in that country.
"The good refugee is welcome": The role of gender when fleeing from war
Media reports on Ukrainian refugees differ from the coverage on Syrian refugees. Beyond potential racism expressed in this discourse, historic and political differences, the potential identification with refugees, and gender discrimination are at stake. Is there a stereotype of a “good refugee” who is welcome to the EU?
Imperialism, language, and not-so-soft power: Analyzing discourses of the
Juldyz Smagulova and Kara Fleming
We critically examine discourses of the 'Russian world’ / ‘русский мир’, the idea that Russia ends where the Russian language ends, tracing concepts of the ‘civilizational mission’ of Russian from the imperial era to the present to show how these discourses move from the realm of soft power to military invasion.
Jens Maesse, Jan Zienkowski, Júlio Bonatti, Johannes Angermuller, Aurora Fragonara, Jan Krasni, David Adler, Jaspal Singh